Taken
January 3rd, 2010
Inspired by George Will’s article In N.Y., government’s eminent arrogance (Washington Post 1/03/10).
George Will might be surprised
To find my views are not what he surmised.
Elsewhere, our chance for agreement might be slim,
But on taking, I agree with him.
I’m against expanded government taking,
Which usually amounts to government faking,
Searching until a public interest is sighted,
Or to declare a neighborhood blighted.
The way a taking is supposed to function
Is when the government builds a road, bridge, or railroad junction,
They have the power to force you to sell for a fair price
To keep holdouts from ripping off the public (that’s not nice).
Of course, in politics, that’s de rigeur,
And practiced by many a political entrepreneur.
Ben Nelson, for example, parlayed his healthcare holdout status
Into handouts for Nebraska (Medicare expansion gratis).
Both approaches represent use of political power to exploit,
At which politicians are adroit.
The Constitution protects individuals from exploitation by the majority.
Too bad the other way around isn’t a priority.
***
PS: For those who missed the titular reference, it’s to both the 2008 Liam Neeson movie and the 2003 Sci-Fi TV Stephen Spielberg miniseries.
Sphere: Related Content
Tags: Ben Nelson, Courts, George Will, Healthcare, Property rights, Republicans
Posted in
Courts, Freedoms, Healthcare, Republicans |
4 Comments »
Get Music, Movies, and More With SuperPass - 14 Day Free Trial
Stream 7 million songs and download MP3s with free Napster trial
March 11th, 2010 at 11:34 pm
[...] Dems will use reconciliation to get rid of the Cornhusker Kickback, [...]
April 11th, 2010 at 10:37 am
[...] The Louisiana Purchase and Cornhusker Kickback [...]
May 18th, 2010 at 12:07 pm
[...] The Louisiana Purchase and Cornhusker Kickback [...]
May 21st, 2010 at 7:21 pm
[...] I’m generally in favor of greater protection for property rights, [...]