Blood Libel
January 13th, 2011
Inspired by Obama calls for healing, not blame, In 2 words, Palin’s effort to address furor stokes it, and Palin and the ‘blood libel’ (Washington Post 1/13/11). Sarah Palin has come out in condemnation of media incitement of hatred. No, she’s not talking about Fox News or right wing talk radio incitement of hatred against liberal, or Muslims, or Obama. She’s talking about the “lamestream” media’s incitement of hatred against her.
“But what we cannot do is use this tragedy as one more occasion to turn on each other.” – President Obama speech to the Nation from Tucson, AZ “Yes, we can.” – Sarah Palin (paraphrased)
Obama has called for healing instead of blame,
But Sarah Palin doesn’t feel the same.
She wants us all to know that she’s the real victim,
Not those unlucky enough to Loughner’s bullets to succumb.
To them, she offers Reagan and the Bible.
But to her critics she offers…
blood libel.
Blood libel is the false accusation
That Jews make matzo with the blood of Christian children.
That allegation has been the justification
For a thousand years of assassination.
Those and other antisemitic views
Were responsible for the horrible deaths of millions of Jews.
Whole communities were destroyed as a result of this myth,
And those victims are who Palin sees herself as comparable with.
It’s “reprehensible” that the media has incited hatred of her
By criticizing Palin’s use of crosshairs, to Gabby Giffords to refer.
There could be consequences to Palin’s map, one such critic pointedly said.
Unfortunately, she couldn’t issue a response due to the bullet in her head.
***
Here’s the President’s “Together We Thrive” speech 1/12/11 in Tucson (click here for the transcript).
Here’s Sarah Palin’s “America’s Enduring Strength” video (click here for the transcript). The contrast between this self-centered, bitter statement and Obama’s speech couldn’t be more stark.
Here’s Giffords during the healthcare debate referring to Sarah Palin’s crosshairs map and saying that things like that have consequences.
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
Here’s Hardball’s 1/13/11 panel discussion about Sarah Palin’s “blood libel” comment, followed by his “let me finish” comment.
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
Here’s the Last Word’s 1/12/11 panel discussion, featuring former Bush speechwriter David Frum and Politics Daily’s David Corn, followed by Lawrence O’Donnell’s excellent “rewrite” (that’s the clip to watch if you’re just going to watch one).
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
Here’s Hardball’s 1/12/11 panel discussion with more about Palin’s blood label comment. Howard Fineman makes some excellent points. The second segment also includes discussion of Glenn Beck’s history of inciting violence. The third segment includes discussion of the proposal by Rep. Robert Brady (D-PA) to extend the prohibition on threatening or inciting violence against the President and Vice President (which outlaws putting targets or crosshairs on pictures of them) to members of Congress.
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
Here’s The Last Word’s 1/13/11 panel discussion, with more information about the history of “blood libel” accusations, followed by O’Donnell’s revelation that “Team Palin” has been deleting negative reactions to her “blood libel” video from Palin’s Facebook page. Gotta love that free speech!
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
Here’s Stephen Colbert’s 1/12/11 report.
| The Colbert Report | Mon – Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c | |||
| The Word – Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Angriness | ||||
|
||||
Here’s the Young Turks’ report. Cenk: I love your stuff, but this time you went a little wrong. “Blood libel” was not what antisemites accused the Jews of, it was what the accusers themselves were guilty of by dint of having libeled the Jews as drinkers of Christian children’s blood. So what Palin is saying is that the accusation that her crosshairs map contributed to the Tucson tragedy is a similarly bigoted, false, and libelous accusation. But other than that, great report.
Where’s Palin get the great idea to talk about blood libel? Well, she says she reads the Wall Street Journal, so maybe she got it from this article from a few days before: Glenn Reynolds: The Arizona Tragedy and the Politics of Blood Libel (WSJ.com 1/10/11).
Update 1/14/11: Here’s Hardball’s further panel discusion.
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
Sphere: Related Content
Tags: Chris Matthews, David Corn, Fox News, Gabby Giffords, Howard Fineman, Incitement, Jared Lee Loughner, Lawrence O'Donnell, Sarah Palin, Tucson shooting, Victimhood, Violence
Posted in
Republicans, What ails us |
4 Comments »
Get Music, Movies, and More With SuperPass - 14 Day Free Trial
Stream 7 million songs and download MP3s with free Napster trial
January 31st, 2011 at 2:07 pm
[...] Obama has called for healing instead of blame, But Sarah Palin doesn’t feel the same. She wants us all to know that she’s the real victim, Not those who happened to Loughner’s bullets to succumb. It’s “reprehensible” that the media has incited hatred of her By criticizing Palin’s use of crosshairs, to Gabby Giffords to refer. There could be consequences to Palin’s map, one such critic pointedly said. Unfortunately, she couldn’t issue a response due to the bullet in her head. — Blood Libel [...]
February 5th, 2011 at 3:59 pm
[...] at campaign rallies, not with those who proudly voted in the last election.” – Sarah Palin on Facebook “The despicable act in Tucson is a horrifying and senseless tragedy, and should be condemned as [...]
February 5th, 2011 at 5:11 pm
[...] (Unlike some others there’s no need to name). [...]
March 14th, 2011 at 2:07 pm
[...] (Your persecution has been so much like theirs). [...]